Negative Security Effect of Biometrics Deployed in Cyberspace

Hitoshi Kokumai
1 min readDec 21, 2019

--

The agenda discussed in this article are

- A default/fallback password is the password, isn’t it?

- Convenience is doubled-edged

- Spoofing and Liveness-Detection

- Is the password weaker than biometrics?

- Is biometrics-only authentication achievable?

-What can we gain from bringing in biometrics into multi-factor authentication?

- Intermezzo: Entertaining Security Parodies

- Haven’t the biometrics promoters built a huge sandcastle?

- This false sense of security has been benefiting criminals, hasn’t it?

- This false sense of security has only been benefiting criminals, hasn’t it?

- Hey, Biometrics Guys! Get Provoked!

Conclusion: The password is insufficient, but not harmful. Biometrics is harmful, and not sufficient. Attempting to make quick money by spreading a false sense of security is ethically dubious and practically suicidal.

#identity #authentication #password #security #biometrics #ethic #privacy #democracy #finance #fintech

--

--

Hitoshi Kokumai
Hitoshi Kokumai

Written by Hitoshi Kokumai

Advocate of ‘Identity Assurance by Our Own Volition and Memory’, Inventor of Expanded Password System and Founder of Mnemonic Identity Solutions Limited in UK.

No responses yet